Guzman v. Katmai Technical Services, LLC et al
Charles Guzman |
Katmai Technical Services, LLC and Does 1 through 20 |
3:2024cv00419 |
March 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Robert S Huie |
David D Leshner |
Michelle M Pettit |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 nr Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Charles Guzman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kristy R. Connolly in Support of Plainitff's Motion for Remand)(Connolly, Kristy) (alns). |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim / Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Katmai Technical Services, LLC. (Juarez, Roland) (alns). |
Filing 9 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by District Judge Robert S. Huie Rejecting re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court , from Plaintiff Charles Guzman. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Plaintiffs Motion for Remand noticed a hearing date of April 3, 2024. Pursuant to CivLR 7.1 and Chambers Civ. Proc. III(B), all noticed motions must set the hearing date to be thirty-five (35) days from the motions filing date.. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Signed by District Judge Robert S. Huie on 4/4/2024. (Attachments: #1 Stricken ECF 7)(alns) (jmo). |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim / Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Charles Guzman. (Connolly, Kristy) (alns). |
Filing 7 **STRICKEN PER ECF #9 ** MOTION to Remand to State Court by Charles Guzman. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Kristy R. Connolly in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand)(Connolly, Kristy) (alns). (Main Document 7 replaced on 4/4/2024) (alns). |
Filing 6 ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER RULE, re #4 Notice of Related Case. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit no longer assigned to case. Create association to 3:23-cv-01671-RSH-DDL. The new case number is 24CV419-RSH-DDL.. Signed by District Judge Robert S. Huie on 3/1/2024.(alns) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim / Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Katmai Technical Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of D. Andrew Quigley, #2 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Juarez, Roland) (alns). |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) of case(s) 3:23-cv-01671-RSH-DDL. (alns) (jmo). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Katmai Technical Services, LLC. Identifying Other Affiliate Katmai Government Services, LLC, Other Affiliate Ouzinkie Native Corporation for Katmai Technical Services, LLC. (rxc) (jmo). |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Katmai Technical Services, LLC identifying Other Affiliate Katmai Government Services, LLC, Other Affiliate Ouzinkie Native Corporation for Katmai Technical Services, LLC.. (rxc) (jmo). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18633621.), filed by Katmai Technical Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Jorge Ochoa in Support of Removal, #3 Certificate of Service)The new case number is 3:24-cv-419-RSH-MMP. Judge Robert S. Huie and Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit are assigned to the case.(rxc) (jmo). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.