Nguon v. Hill et al
Hung Duong Nguon |
James S. Hill and Xavier Becerra |
3:2024cv00440 |
March 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Daniel E Butcher |
Linda Lopez |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Transfer Letter Received from Central District of California. Case number in other court is 2:24cv02297 (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
Filing 4 Case transferred to Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *Central District of California, Western Division*.*350 West 1st Street STE 4311, 4th Floor**Los Angeles, CA 900124565*. Signed by Judge Linda Lopez on 3/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ddf) |
Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 152105, Paid on 3/14/2024 (bdc) (anh). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages, MOTION for Certificate of Appealability by Hung Duong Nguon. (bdc) (anh). |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Xavier Becerra, James S. Hill (Filing fee $ 5, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed.), filed by Hung Duong Nguon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-440-LL-DEB. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case.(bdc) (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.