Skechers U.S.A., Inc. et al v. Sanchez et al
| Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and Skechers U.S.A., Inc., II |
| Ed Sanchez, Ed Sanchez doing business as golfgrade.com, Golf Pulp Media and Does 1-10 inclusive |
| 3:2024cv00483 |
| March 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (jms). |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *D986,576*, *D990,858*, *D992,888*, *D994,312*, *D998,951* cc:USPTO (ggv)(jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1-10 inclusive, Golf Pulp Media, Ed Sanchez ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18659656.), filed by Skechers U.S.A., Inc., Skechers U.S.A., Inc., II. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 to Complaint, #4 Exhibit 3 to Complaint, #5 Exhibit 4 to Complaint, #6 Exhibit 5 to Complaint)The new case number is 3:24-cv-483-RBM-MSB. Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Mattes, Bradford)(ggv) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
