Ryerson v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. et al
| Tina Ryerson |
| Alaska Airlines, Inc., Does 1 to 50 and SkyWest Airlines, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv00489 |
| March 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Robert S Huie |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
NOTICE And Order For Early Neutral Evaluation Conference And Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 3/13/2024.(alns)
|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by SkyWest Airlines, Inc. REGARDING SERVICE OF SUBSEQUENT DOCUMENT FILINGS (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Basile, Carl) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Alaska Airlines, Inc.. (stn) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Alaska Airlines, Inc.. Identifying Other Affiliate SKYWEST Airlines Inc. for Alaska Airlines, Inc.. (stn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18664219.), filed by Alaska Airlines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)The new case number is 3:24-cv-489-RSH-BLM. Judge Robert S. Huie and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.(stn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
