Ahlstrom et al v. Aerotek, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joshua Ahlstrom, Lydell Burston and Quintin Baker
Defendant: Aerotek, Inc., Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC and Does 1 to 10
Case Number: 3:2024cv00507
Filed: March 15, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Roger T Benitez
Referring Judge: Steve B Chu
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2024 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Aerotek, Inc. (ggv)
March 15, 2024 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC. (ggv)
March 15, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Sekisui America Corporation for Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC. (ggv)
March 15, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18674831.), filed by Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Nicole R. Roysdon, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Declaration of Helene Fitch Friedlander, #8 Proof of Service Certificate of Service)The new case number is 3:24-cv-507-BEN-SBC. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case.(ggv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ahlstrom et al v. Aerotek, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Ahlstrom
Represented By: Karnbiz Drake
Represented By: Mac E. Nehoray
Represented By: Thomas Edward Wheeler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lydell Burston
Represented By: Mac E. Nehoray
Represented By: Thomas Edward Wheeler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quintin Baker
Represented By: Karnbiz Drake
Represented By: Mac E. Nehoray
Represented By: Thomas Edward Wheeler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aerotek, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC
Represented By: Nicole R. Roysdon
Represented By: Sanam Khajenoori
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?