Brandes Worldwide Holdings LP v. United States of America

Petitioner: Brandes Worldwide Holdings LP
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2024cv00519
Filed: March 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michelle M Pettit
Referring Judge: Dana M Sabraw
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2024 Filing 11 ORDER Dismissing The Case Pursuant To Parties' Joint Stipulation Of Dismissal #10 . Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/19/2024.(ddf)
April 18, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by United States of America Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(De Palma, Lolita) (ddf).
March 26, 2024 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brandes Worldwide Holdings LP. United States of America served. (Attachments: #1 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #2 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Exhibit 1 - Executed Affidavit of Service, #5 Exhibit 2 - Proof of Certified Mailings)(Erbsen, Diana) (jpp).
March 22, 2024 Filing 8 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jpp) (rmc).
March 21, 2024 Filing 7 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jpp) (rmc).
March 21, 2024 Filing 6 ORDER setting briefing schedule. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 3/21/2024.(jpp)
March 20, 2024 Filing 5 PRO HAC APPROVED: James Francis Bresnahan, III appearing for Petitioner Brandes Worldwide Holdings LP (no document attached) (rmc)
March 20, 2024 Filing 4 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 224 receipt number ACASDC-18688033.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Bresnahan, James) (rmc).
March 20, 2024 Filing 3 PRO HAC APPROVED: Diana L. Erbsen appearing for Petitioner Brandes Worldwide Holdings LP (no document attached) (rmc)
March 20, 2024 Filing 2 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 224 receipt number ACASDC-18687884.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Erbsen, Diana) (rmc).
March 18, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION to Quash IRS Third-Party Summonses by Brandes Worldwide Holdings LP. (no document attached) (rxc) (jmo).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brandes Worldwide Holdings LP v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brandes Worldwide Holdings LP
Represented By: Melissa Anne Reinckens
Represented By: Victoria Zehao Gu
Represented By: Diana L. Erbsen
Represented By: James Francis Bresnahan, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?