Campbell v. Walmart, Inc. et al
| Robert M. Campbell |
| Walmart, Inc. and Does 1 thru 25 |
| 3:2024cv00534 |
| March 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| John A Houston |
| Linda Lopez |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Valerie E Torres |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Walmart, Inc..(McDonald, Christopher)Attorney Christopher Mark McDonald added to party Walmart, Inc.(pty:dft) (mjw). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert M. Campbell. Walmart, Inc. served. (bdc) |
|
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) of case(s) 23-cv-01044-JAH-BLM. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ddf) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (rxc) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1 thru 25, Walmart, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 152248.), filed by Robert M. Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:24-cv-534-LL-VET. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres are assigned to the case.(rxc) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.