Stephen v. Nutra Holdings, Inc. et al
| Russell Stephen |
| Nutra Holdings, Inc., Nutra Holdings Two, Inc., Amazon, Inc. and John Williams |
| 3:2024cv00546 |
| March 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to First Amended Complaint by Amazon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kevin S. Asfour)(Asfour, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Amazon, Inc. . No Parties With Financial Interest. (Asfour, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Amazon, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Asfour, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18694283.), filed by Amazon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A (Original Complaint), #3 Exhibit B (First Amended Complaint), #4 Exhibit C (As-Served Summons & First Amended Complaint), #5 Exhibit D (State Court Record (3.15.24))The new case number is 3:24-cv-546-GPC-BLM. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.(rxc) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
