Rajaee v. Davis et al
Ashkan Rajaee |
Joshua Paul Lintz, Talentcrowd, LLC, Melissa Garcia, Vincil Bishop, Amanda Frye, Scott R Carpenter, Cummins & White LLP, Joseph W. Scalia, Porter Consulting, LLC, TOPDEVZ, LLC, Does 1 through 15 and Tyler Brandon Davis |
3:2024cv00550 |
March 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Daniel E Butcher |
Linda Lopez |
Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Electronically File Documents by Ashkan Rajaee. (stn) (anh). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (stn) (anh). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Tyler Brandon Davis, Vincil Bishop, Scott R Carpenter, Cummins & White LLP, Amanda Frye, Melissa Garcia, Joshua Paul Lintz, Porter Consulting, LLC, Joseph W. Scalia, TOPDEVZ, LLC, Talentcrowd, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 152278.), filed by Ashkan Rajaee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:24-cv-550-LL-DEB. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (stn). (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.