Tammy Taylor Nails, Inc. v. Viljoen et al
| Tammy Taylor Nails, Inc. |
| Melany Viljoen, Peet Viljoen, Tammy Taylor Global Franchising and Does 1 through 10 |
| 3:2024cv00624 |
| April 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (axi) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *3215705*, *6234220*, *7146638*, *3215706*, *2017/16838*, *2017/16839*, *2019/14604*, *2019/14605* cc:USPTO (axi) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Tammy Taylor Nails, Inc. No Parties With Financial Interest. (axi) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1 through 10, Tammy Taylor Global Franchising, Melany Viljoen, Peet Viljoen ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18722743.), filed by Tammy Taylor Nails, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-624-BAS-JLB. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Kelly, Patrick)(axi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
