Transpota v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
| Robert Transpota |
| The Home Depot, Inc. and Does 1 through 25 |
| 3:2024cv00660 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 lr Diversity - Labor |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Does 1 through 25, The Home Depot, Inc.. No Parties With Financial Interest. (axc1)(anh). |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Does 1 through 25, The Home Depot, Inc.. (axc1) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Does 1 through 25, The Home Depot, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (axc1) (anh). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18746993.), filed by Does 1 through 25, The Home Depot, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Info Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration Declaration, #3 Exhibit a, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit c, #6 Exhibit d, #7 Supplement Notice of Pendency, #8 Supplement Notice of Removal and supporting papers)The new case number is 3:24-cv-660-DMS-MSB. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(axc1) (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
