Prout v. Costco
| Kevin M Prout |
| Costco |
| 3:2024cv00703 |
| April 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Daniel E Butcher |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 va Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: (1) Ordering Plaintiff to Show Cause Why the EEOC Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction; (2) Severing Claims Against Costco and Terminating Costco and Costco's Motion to Dismiss in this Action; (3) Setting Schedule for Outstanding Briefing on SEIU's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/18/24.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aas)
|
| Filing 9 REPLY - Costco Wholesale Corporation's Reply re #7 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Costco. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(aas) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Vacating Hearing on Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation's Motion to Dismiss #10 and Taking the Matter Under Submission. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/31/24.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aas)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kevin M Prout. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -Exhibit Evidence for Opposition: Exhbit of Costco's Motion to Dismiss)(aas) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule for Defendant Costco's #5 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/3/24.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aas)
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Motion and MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Costco. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Alan B Graves, #3 Proof of Service)(aas) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kevin M Prout, as to Costco. (aas) |
| Filing 3 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Kevin M Prout as to Costco. (aas) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (aas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Costco ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number waived.), filed by Kevin M Prout. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-703-JLS-DEB. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case.(aas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Prout v. Costco | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin M Prout | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Costco | |
| Represented By: | Alan Boyd Graves |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
