Del Mar Woods v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Del Mar Woods |
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company |
3:2024cv00779 |
May 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Steve B Chu |
William Q Hayes |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 in Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE And Order For Early Neutral Evaluation Conference And Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu on 6/17/2024.(alns) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp., Corporate Parent Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Tokio Marine North America, Inc., Corporate Parent Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire Insurance Company, Ltd for Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company.. (Darling-Alderton, Lisa) (alns). |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company.(Darling-Alderton, Lisa) (alns). |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company answer due 6/13/2024. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/4/2024. (alns)(jmo). |
Filing 6 Joint Motion for Order to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint (Darling-Alderton, Lisa)Attorney Lisa Marie Darling-Alderton added to party Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company(pty:dft) (rxc). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Del Mar Woods. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company served. (Schulz, Peter) (rxc). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (jmo). |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Del Mar Woods. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (ggv) (jmo). |
Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Del Mar Woods. (ggv) (jmo). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18809646.), filed by Del Mar Woods. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Table of Contents, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2)The new case number is 3:24-cv-779-WQH-SBC. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case. (Schulz, Peter)(ggv) (jmo). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Del Mar Woods v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Del Mar Woods | |
Represented By: | Michael Edward Rogaski |
Represented By: | Peter J. Schulz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Lisa Marie Darling-Alderton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.