Hurtado et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
| Marco Hurtado and Alejandra Hurtado |
| Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 10 |
| 3:2024cv00835 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michelle M Pettit |
| James E Simmons |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael William Oppenheim on behalf of Alejandra Hurtado, Marco Hurtado (Oppenheim, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Sepehr Daghighian on behalf of Alejandra Hurtado, Marco Hurtado (Daghighian, Sepehr) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Harris Rosenstein on behalf of Alejandra Hurtado, Marco Hurtado (Rosenstein, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (axc1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18838075.), filed by Marco Hurtado, Alejandra Hurtado. (Attachments: #1 Info Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:24-cv-835-JES-MMP. Judge James E. Simmons, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit are assigned to the case. (Rosenstein, Michael)(axc1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
