Jesalva v. Discover Bank et al
| Jeff Jesalva |
| Discover Bank and Does 1-20 |
| 3:2024cv00836 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michelle M Pettit |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Discover Bank identifying Corporate Parent Discover Financial Services, Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Inc. for Discover Bank.. (Rao, Arjun) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Discover Bank . Identifying Corporate Parent Discover Financial Services, Other Affiliate Discover Bank, Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Inc. for Discover Bank. (Rao, Arjun) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Discover Bank. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Rao, Arjun) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeff Jesalva. Discover Bank served. (Rahimi, Farmon) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18838034.), filed by Discover Bank. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A- Summons and Complaint, #3 Certificate of Service)The new case number is 3:24-cv-836-AGS-MMP. Judge Andrew G. Schopler and Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit are assigned to the case.(anh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
