Dalagan et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
| Rogelio Dalagan and Lorna Dalagan |
| Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 10 |
| 3:2024cv01030 |
| June 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Linda Lopez |
| Valerie E Torres |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 oc Notice of Removal - Other Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. Identifying Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz Group, Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz North America Corporation (MBNAC), Corporate Parent Daimler International Nederland B.V. (DINBV) for Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (axi) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (axi) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (axi) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18932459.), filed by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Taylor N. Donoho, #3 Exhibit A - Complaint, #4 Exhibit B - Answer, #5 Exhibit C - All pleadings, #6 Exhibit D - MSRP, #7 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:24-cv-1030-LL-VET. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres are assigned to the case.(axi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
