Hoard v. Capital One, N.A.
| Azlynne Hoard |
| Capital One, N.A. |
| 3:2024cv01133 |
| June 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Valerie E Torres |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Minute Order Taking Motion Under Submission: Upon review of Defendant Capital One, N.A.'s #10 MOTION to Dismiss, the Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, no appearances are required, the hearing set for August 26, 2024 is vacated, and the Undersigned shall issue a written ruling on the motion in due course. IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Michael M. Anello on August 21, 2024. (lkg)
|
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint filed by Capital One, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Reply in Support of Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Marianne Spencer, #3 Exhibit G, #4 Exhibit H)(Mojibi Yazdi, Ali) (aas). |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint filed by Azlynne Hoard. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice Opposition to Request for Judicial Notice)(Kaliel, Jeffrey) (aas). |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint by Capital One, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Marianne Spencer, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Declaration of Siying Shen, #10 Exhibit A to Declaration of Siying Shen)(Mojibi Yazdi, Ali) (maq). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Adam Edelsberg on behalf of Azlynne Hoard (Edelsberg, Scott)Attorney Scott Adam Edelsberg added to party Azlynne Hoard(pty:pla) (aas). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #7 Joint Motion for Extension of Time. Capital One, N.A. answer due 7/19/2024.. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/3/24. (aas)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Capital One, N.A.. (Mojibi Yazdi, Ali) (aas). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Marianne E. Spencer, re #4 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/2/2024.(exs)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Andrew Soukup, re #3 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/2/2024.(exs)
|
| Filing 4 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 224 receipt number ACASDC-18979982.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Spencer, Marianne) |
| Filing 3 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 224 receipt number ACASDC-18979963.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Soukup, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Capital One, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Capital One Financial Corporation for Capital One, N.A.. (Mojibi Yazdi, Ali) (rxc). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18974935.), filed by Capital One, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proof Of Service, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7)The new case number is 3:24-cv-1133-MMA-VET. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres are assigned to the case.(stn) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
