Sesma et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
| Vladimir Mayorga and Vanessa Sesma |
| Does 1 through 10 and Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC |
| 3:2024cv01639 |
| September 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Steve B Chu |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 bc Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. Identifying Corporate Parent Mercedes-Benz North America Corporation (MBNAC), Other Affiliate Daimler International Nederland B.V., Other Affiliate Mercedes-Benz Group for Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (axi) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (axi) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (axi) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-19180935.), filed by Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Kaitlin E. Preston, #3 Exhibit A - Complaint, #4 Exhibit B - Answer, #5 Exhibit C - Other Pleadings, #6 Exhibit D - MSRP, #7 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:24-cv-1639-BEN-SBC. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case.(axi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
