Olden v. AngioDynamics, Inc et al
| Jason Olden |
| Navilyst Medical, Inc. and Angiodynamics, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv01923 |
| October 17, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jinsook Ohta |
| Valerie E Torres |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Judge Jinsook Ohta and Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres assigned to transfer case from Central District of California. (no document attached) (rmc) |
| Filing 16 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 5:24-cv-01846. Original file received electronically (rmc) |
| Filing 15 Conditional Transfer Order - 1 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 3125, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of California and assigned to Honorable Jinsook Ohta. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (aco) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Jason Olden, (Rizkalla, Ruth) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Jason Olden. upon Navilyst Medical, Inc waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/12/2024, answer due 11/12/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Thomas J. Yoo. (Rizkalla, Ruth) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Jason Olden. upon AngioDynamics, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 9/12/2024, answer due 11/12/2024. Waiver of Service signed by Thomas J. Yoo. (Rizkalla, Ruth) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 11 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jason Olden. (Rizkalla, Ruth) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Improper form used. Please use Civil Cover Sheet Form CV-71, which can be found on the Court's website under Court Procedures by selecting "Forms" from the drop down menu. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 9 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jason Olden. (Rizkalla, Ruth) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
Filing 8
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (npo) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER IN RESPONSE TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. (rolm) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.]
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. (car) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Adam M Evans. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38118299 - Fee: $405. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Ruth Rizkalla added to party Jason Olden (pty:pla))(Rizkalla, Ruth) [Transferred from California Central on 10/17/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
