Mu Tech, Inc. v. Kok Yin et al
| Mu Tech, Inc. |
| Thomas Lee Cheuk Wai, Catherine Chan Kok Yin, Majestic Plan Investments Limited, Does 1 thru 50 and Belton Technology, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv01976 |
| October 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| John A Houston |
| Valerie E Torres |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Belton Technology, Inc., Thomas Lee Cheuk Wai, Does 1 thru 50, Catherine Chan Kok Yin, Majestic Plan Investments Limited ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-19291950.), filed by Mu Tech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-1976-JAH-VET. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres are assigned to the case. (Jing, Jiang)(ggv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
