Enos v. Union Stone, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellee: PAUL ENOS, Chairman of the Rhode Island Bricklayers Benefits Funds
Defendant - Appellant: UNION STONE, INC.
Case Number: 12-2480
Filed: December 10, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Empl. Ret. Inc. Security Act

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 15, 2013 Summary Enos v. Union Stone, Inc.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 106596398 OPINION issued by Sandra L. Lynch, Chief Appellate Judge; Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge and Richard Stearns, U.S. District Judge. Published. [12-2480]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Enos v. Union Stone, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: PAUL ENOS, Chairman of the Rhode Island Bricklayers Benefits Funds
Represented By: Darren F. Corrente
Represented By: Karl J. Gross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: UNION STONE, INC.
Represented By: Andrew J. Tine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?