US v. Castro-Caicedo
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: GUSTAVO CASTRO-CAICEDO, a/k/a Luis Amaro
Case Number: 13-1046
Filed: January 11, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 24, 2014 Summary United States v. Castro-Caicedo

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 106780312 OPINION issued by Sandra L. Lynch, Chief Appellate Judge; Bruce M. Selya, Appellate Judge and David J. Barron, Appellate Judge. Published. [13-1046]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Castro-Caicedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Dina Michael Chaitowitz
Represented By: David J. D'Addio
Represented By: Zachary R. Hafer
Represented By: George W. Vien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: GUSTAVO CASTRO-CAICEDO, a/k/a Luis Amaro
Represented By: Robert J. Galibois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?