Schussel v. Werfel
Petitioner - Appellant: GEORGE SCHUSSEL
Respondent - Appellee: DANIEL I. WERFEL, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 13-1717
Filed: June 3, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 8, 2014 Summary Schussel v. Werfel

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 106710752 OPINION issued by Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge; Norman H. Stahl, Appellate Judge and William J. Kayatta , Jr., Appellate Judge. Published. [13-1717]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Schussel v. Werfel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: GEORGE SCHUSSEL
Represented By: Francis J. DiMento
Represented By: Frank W. Tessitore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: DANIEL I. WERFEL, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Represented By: Janet F. Appel
Represented By: Carina J. Campobasso
Represented By: William J. Wilkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?