US v. Prange
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES PRANGE
Case Number: 13-2262
Filed: October 9, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 5, 2014 Summary United States v. Prange

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 106761026 OPINION issued by William J. Kayatta , Jr., Appellate Judge; Bobby R. Baldock, Appellate Judge and Bruce M. Selya, Appellate Judge. Published. [13-2262, 13-2328]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Prange
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Dina Michael Chaitowitz
Represented By: Christopher Richard Donato
Represented By: Stephen Emanuel Frank
Represented By: Vassili N. Thomadakis
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Walters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: JAMES PRANGE
Represented By: Steven N. Fuller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?