Lee v. Corsini
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT M. LEE
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL CORSINI
Case Number: 14-1070
Filed: January 15, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: General (Habeas Corpus)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 26, 2015 Summary Lee v. Corsini

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 106791572 OPINION issued by Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge; Bruce M. Selya, Appellate Judge and Norman H. Stahl, Appellate Judge. Published. [14-1070]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lee v. Corsini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: ROBERT M. LEE
Represented By: Mary Therese Rogers
Represented By: Robert M. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: MICHAEL CORSINI
Represented By: Amy L. Karangekis
Represented By: Natalie S. Monroe
Represented By: Jonathan M. Ofilos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?