Travers v. Flight Services & Systems, Inc
| JOSEPH TRAVERS |
| FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, INC. |
| 14-1745 |
| July 9, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Labor Litigation |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Travers v. Flight Services & Systems, Inc.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106931768
OPINION issued by Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge; Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge and David J. Barron, Appellate Judge. Published. [14-1745, 14-1756]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Travers v. Flight Services & Systems, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: JOSEPH TRAVERS | |
| Represented By: | Shannon Liss-Riordan |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Tully |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: FLIGHT SERVICES & SYSTEMS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Mark Rosin |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Pardo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
