Castillo Codominium v. HUD
Petitioner: CASTILLO CODOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Case Number: 14-2139
Filed: October 29, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 2, 2016 Summary Castillo Condo. Ass’n v. U.S. Dep’t of Housing & Urban Dev.
May 2, 2016 Castillo Condominium v. HUD

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 106993149 OPINION issued by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge; Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge and Bruce M. Selya, Appellate Judge. Published. [14-2139, 15-1223]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Castillo Codominium v. HUD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CASTILLO CODOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
Represented By: Sigfredo A. Irizarry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Represented By: Nelson Jose Perez-Sosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?