Cronkite v. Bank of New York Mellon
| RAYMOND E. CRONKITE |
| BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee for the certificateholders of the CWABS Inc., ASSETT-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-13, f/k/a Bank of New York |
| DIANNE L'HEUREUX |
| 15-1942 |
| August 19, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Appeal 28 USC 158 |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cronkite v. Bank of New York Mellon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Debtor - appellant: RAYMOND E. CRONKITE | |
| Represented By: | Raymond E. Cronkite |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee for the certificateholders of the CWABS Inc., ASSETT-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-13, f/k/a Bank of New York | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Stephen Cannella |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Interested party: DIANNE L'HEUREUX | |
| Represented By: | Dianne L'Heureux |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
