Connors v. Massachusetts Parole Board, et al
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLENE CONNORS
Respondent - Appellee: MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD and LYNN BISSONNETTE, Superintendent of MCI-Framingham
Case Number: 16-1461
Filed: May 4, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: General (Habeas Corpus)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 15, 2017 Connors v. Grenier

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Connors v. Massachusetts Parole Board, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: CHARLENE CONNORS
Represented By: Elizabeth R. Dembitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Represented By: Ryan Edmund Ferch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: LYNN BISSONNETTE, Superintendent of MCI-Framingham
Represented By: Ryan Edmund Ferch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?