Doe v. Standard Insurance Company

Plaintiff - Appellant: JANE DOE
Defendant - Appellee: STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 16-2085
Filed: August 26, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Empl. Ret. Inc. Security Act

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
March 24, 2017 Summary Doe v. Standard Insurance Co.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 24, 2017 107133893 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION issued by Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge; David H. Souter,* Associate Supreme Court Justice and Bobby R. Baldock,** Appellate Judge. Published. *Hon. David H. Souter, Associate Justice (Ret.) of the Supreme Court of the United States, sitting by designation. **Hon. Bobby R. Baldock, Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. [16-2085]
Search for this case: Doe v. Standard Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JANE DOE
Represented By: Geraldine G. Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Kyle Nicholas Kirby
Represented By: Brooks R. Magratten
Represented By: Scott K. Pomeroy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?