Lobel v. Woodland Golf Club of Auburnda
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD LOBEL
Defendant - Appellee: WOODLAND GOLF CLUB OF AUBURNDALE
Interested Party: GERALD CHERVINSKY
Case Number: 17-1657
Filed: July 6, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Amer. w/Disabilities - Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lobel v. Woodland Golf Club of Auburnda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: RICHARD LOBEL
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Denner
Represented By: Michael Longo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: WOODLAND GOLF CLUB OF AUBURNDALE
Represented By: Erin C. Horton
Represented By: Donald William Schroeder
Represented By: Natalie C. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: GERALD CHERVINSKY
Represented By: Joshua A. McGuire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?