Diaz-Cestary v. US
| EDGARDO DIAZ-CESTARY |
| UNITED STATES |
| 19-1020 |
| January 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to extend time to request a certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Edgardo Diaz-Cestary. Certificate of service dated 02/19/2019. [19-1020] (VMM) [Entered: 02/19/2019 11:16 AM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to request certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Edgardo Diaz-Cestary. Memorandum supporting issuance of CAP due 03/21/2019. [19-1020] (GK) [Entered: 02/19/2019 03:26 PM]
|
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Edgardo Diaz-Cestary. Certificate of service dated 01/25/2019. [19-1020] (VMM) [Entered: 01/25/2019 09:12 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee US filed by Attorney Mariana E. Bauza-Almonte. Certificate of service dated 01/18/2019. [19-1020] (MEB) [Entered: 01/18/2019 10:10 AM] |
|
ORDER directing petitioner to file a request for a certificate of appealabilty in this court by 02/19/2019. Date of denial by district court: October 24, 2018. [19-1020] (KC) [Entered: 01/17/2019 10:30 AM]
|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Edgardo Diaz-Cestary filed by Attorney Vivianne M. Marrero-Torres. Certificate of service dated 01/15/2019. [19-1020] (VMM) [Entered: 01/15/2019 02:54 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #11) filed by Appellant Edgardo Diaz-Cestary. Docketing Statement and Appearance form due 01/25/2019. [19-1020] (KC) [Entered: 01/11/2019 01:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
