Padmanabhan v. Healey, et al
Defendant / Appellee: STEVEN L HOFFMAN, JAMES PAIKOS, MAURA T. HEALEY, ADELE AUDET, LORETTA KISH COOKE and CHRIS CECCHINI
Plaintiff / Appellant: BHARANIDHARAN PADMANABHAN, MD PhD (Dr. Bharani)
Case Number: 19-1098
Filed: January 25, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2019 MOTION to take judicial notice filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Certificate of service dated 03/17/2019. [19-1098] (BP) [Entered: 03/17/2019 09:34 PM]
March 15, 2019 MOTION to take judicial notice filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Certificate of service dated 03/15/2019. [19-1098] (BP) [Entered: 03/15/2019 12:34 AM]
March 14, 2019 MOTION to take judicial notice filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Certificate of service dated 03/14/2019. [19-1098] (BP) [Entered: 03/14/2019 07:34 AM]
March 11, 2019 REPLY filed by Appellees Adele Audet, Chris Cecchini, Loretta Kish Cooke, Maura T. Healey, Steven L Hoffman and James Paikos to response [ # 6236708-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 03/11/2019. [19-1098] (MPS) [Entered: 03/11/2019 02:26 PM]
March 3, 2019 RESPONSE filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan to motion to dismiss or for summary disposition [ # 6236193-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 03/03/2019. [19-1098] (BP) [Entered: 03/03/2019 08:18 PM]
February 28, 2019 MOTION to stay Briefing Schedule filed by Appellees Adele Audet, Chris Cecchini, Loretta Kish Cooke, Maura T. Healey, Steven L Hoffman and James Paikos. Certificate of service dated 02/28/2019. [19-1098] (MPS) [Entered: 02/28/2019 03:57 PM]
February 28, 2019 MOTION to dismiss or for summary disposition filed by Appellees James Paikos, Adele Audet, Chris Cecchini, Loretta Kish Cooke, Maura T. Healey and Steven L Hoffman. Certificate of service dated 02/28/2019. [19-1098] (MPS) [Entered: 02/28/2019 03:53 PM]
February 28, 2019 MOTION to hold appellees in default and enforce the briefing schedule and RESPONSE to motion to stay [ # 6236201-2 ] filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Certificate of service dated 02/28/2019. [19-1098] (BP) [Entered: 02/28/2019 04:24 PM]
February 14, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge: Appellant's "Motion to Enforce Briefing Schedule" is denied as unnecessary, without prejudice to re-filing should appellees seek an extension of time to file their brief. [19-1098] (TS) [Entered: 02/14/2019 01:24 PM]
January 30, 2019 APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Number of copies: 4. Certificate of service dated 01/10/2019. Brief due 03/01/2019 for APPELLEES Adele Audet, Chris Cecchini, Loretta Kish Cooke, Maura T. Healey, Steven L Hoffman and James Paikos. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/30/2019 03:46 PM]
January 30, 2019 MOTION TO ENFORCE THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Certificate of service dated 01/30/2019. [19-1098] (BP) [Entered: 01/30/2019 05:11 PM]
January 30, 2019 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 03/11/2019 for appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellees' brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief, and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellees' brief. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/30/2019 03:22 PM]
January 28, 2019 LETTER sent to Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan in response to his recent filings. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/28/2019 02:22 PM]
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: Upon consideration of appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan's motion for electronic filing privileges, the motion is denied as moot. Non-incarcerated pro se litigants may register for electronic filing at www.pacer.gov without leave of the court. See 1st Cir. R. 25.0(c). [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/28/2019 02:18 PM]
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER denying as moot motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. [19-1098] (GK) [Entered: 01/28/2019 12:59 PM]
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: Upon consideration of plaintiff-appellant's motion for leave to proceed on the original record, the motion is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 30(f) ("The court may . . . dispense with the appendix and permit an appeal to proceed on the original record with any copies of the record, or relevant parts, that the court may order the parties to file."); 1st Cir. R. 30.0(d) ("All pro se appeals proceeding in forma pauperis shall be considered on the record on appeal as certified by the clerk of the district court without the necessity of filing an appendix unless otherwise ordered by this court in a specific case."). To the extent appellant is also seeking to waive paper copies of his opening brief and addendum, his motion is denied as moot without prejudice to renewal if, once a briefing schedule enters, his tendered, principal brief is rejected as non-compliant. Appellant already provided four (4) paper copies of his tendered, principal brief to the court and will not be required to provide additional paper copies if the tendered brief is accepted for filing. See Fed. R. App. P. 31(b) ("An unrepresented party proceeding in forma pauperis must file 4 legible copies with the clerk. . . ."). [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/28/2019 02:20 PM]
January 25, 2019 MOTION for Leave to Be Heard on the Original Record filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Certificate of service dated 01/10/2019. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 03:23 PM]
January 25, 2019 MOTION for Electronic Filing Privileges filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Certificate of service dated 01/10/2019. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 03:22 PM]
January 25, 2019 Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan was granted in the district court by order dated 01/18/2019. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 10:32 AM]
January 25, 2019 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 03:25 PM]
January 25, 2019 MOTION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Certificate of service dated 01/10/2019. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 03:31 PM]
January 25, 2019 PLEADING tendered: Opening Brief filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. Certificate of service dated 01/10/2019. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 03:33 PM]
January 25, 2019 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #72) filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 10:26 AM]
January 25, 2019 DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 03:29 PM]
January 25, 2019 NOTICE of appearance filed by Party Bharanidharan Padmanabhan. [19-1098] (MH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 03:26 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Padmanabhan v. Healey, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STEVEN L HOFFMAN
Represented By: Mark P. Sutliff
Represented By: Adam Robert LaGrassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JAMES PAIKOS
Represented By: Mark P. Sutliff
Represented By: Adam Robert LaGrassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MAURA T. HEALEY
Represented By: Mark P. Sutliff
Represented By: Adam Robert LaGrassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ADELE AUDET
Represented By: Mark P. Sutliff
Represented By: Adam Robert LaGrassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LORETTA KISH COOKE
Represented By: Mark P. Sutliff
Represented By: Adam Robert LaGrassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHRIS CECCHINI
Represented By: Mark P. Sutliff
Represented By: Adam Robert LaGrassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BHARANIDHARAN PADMANABHAN, MD PhD (Dr. Bharani)
Represented By: Bharanidharan Padmanabhan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?