US v. Trim
| NORSTATE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, MACHIAS SAVINGS BANK, KEYBANK, CAPITAL ONE BANK, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., DOWN EAST CREDIT UNION, SEBASTICOOK VALLEY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and AMERICAN EXPRESS |
| SEAN TRIM |
| UNITED STATES |
| 19-1156 |
| February 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for appointment of counsel; MOTION for Attorneys Geoffrey G. Nathan and Neale A. Duffett to withdraw as counsel filed by Appellant Sean Trim. Certificate of service dated 03/21/2019. [19-1156] CLERK'S NOTE: Relief selection was incomplete. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (GGN) [Entered: 03/21/2019 04:54 AM] |
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant Sean Trim was granted in the district court by order dated 03/14/2019. [19-1156] (GK) [Entered: 03/14/2019 10:07 AM] |
SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: 128 (Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis) and 129 (Electronic Order entered on March 14, 2019 by Judge Levy granting [128] Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis). [19-1156] (GK) [Entered: 03/14/2019 10:05 AM]
|
|
ORDER entered: Treating appellant's financial affidavit as a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis ("IFP"), we transmit said request to the district court Docket No. 2:17-cr-00103-JDL-1 (D. Me.). Copies of the district court's ruling shall be forwarded to this court. The district court, if it denies the motion, is requested to state its reasons in writing. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(2). If appellant is not granted IFP status by the district court, he may file a motion to proceed IFP in this court, provided that he do so in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). [19-1156] (AL) [Entered: 03/12/2019 01:15 PM]
|
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed pro se by Appellant Sean Trim. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1156] (AL) [Entered: 03/05/2019 03:59 PM] |
| FORM for selection of counsel on appeal filed pro se by Appellant Sean Trim requesting the appointment of new counsel. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1156] (AL) [Entered: 03/05/2019 04:01 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee US filed by Attorney Renee M. Bunker. Certificate of service dated 03/04/2019. [19-1156] (RMB) [Entered: 03/04/2019 03:59 PM] |
|
ORDER entered: Attorneys Geoffrey G. Nathan and Neale A. Duffett have filed a motion seeking to withdraw as counsel for defendant-appellant Sean Trim. The motion is denied without prejudice to refiling accompanied by supporting documentation in compliance with Local Rule 46.6. Specifically, counsel must attach documentation, signed by defendant-appellant, indicating (1) whether defendant-appellant wishes to proceed pro se, (2) whether defendant-appellant has retained new counsel, or (3) whether defendant-appellant wishes to apply for appointed counsel. If defendant-appellant wishes to apply for appointed counsel, defendant-appellant must, with the assistance of Attorneys Nathan and Duffett , (a) file a financial affidavit and move to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") in the district court, and (b) provide this court with proof of filing. If the district court grants defendant-appellant IFP status, this court may appoint counsel under the guidelines of the Criminal Justice Act, 8 U.S.C. 3006A. If the district court denies the motion, defendant-appellant must file a motion to proceed IFP and financial affidavit in this court. Attorneys Nathan and Duffett are directed to Local Rule 46.6(a) providing that, An attorney who has represented a defendant in a criminal case in the district court will be responsible for representing the defendant on appeal . . . until the attorney is relieved of such duty by the court of appeals. (emphasis added). Therefore, counsel is responsible for meeting all filing deadlines in this appeal until they are allowed to withdraw. [19-1156] (AL) [Entered: 02/27/2019 02:07 PM]
|
| TRANSCRIPT order acknowledgment filed by Court Reporter Dennis Richard Ford indicating satisfactory financial arrangements have not been made. [19-1156] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to attach a missing document. (TS) [Entered: 02/22/2019 03:36 PM] |
| MOTION for Attorney Geoffrey Nathan and Neale Duffett to withdraw as counsel filed by Appellant Sean Trim. Certificate of service dated 02/19/2019. [19-1156] (GGN) [Entered: 02/19/2019 09:43 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Sean Trim indicating transcripts are being ordered. Certificate of service dated 02/19/2019. [19-1156]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to replace an attachment. (GGN) [Entered: 02/19/2019 09:36 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ordered: 01/24/2019, Sentencing Hearing. Transcript due 04/22/2019 from Court Reporter Dennis Richard Ford. [19-1156] (GB) [Entered: 02/19/2019 01:26 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Sean Trim. Certificate of service dated 02/13/2019. [19-1156] CLERK'S NOTE: The document is unsigned. Correction made by counsel. No further action required. (GGN) [Entered: 02/13/2019 04:24 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Sean Trim. Certificate of service dated 02/13/2019. [19-1156] (GGN) [Entered: 02/13/2019 04:39 PM] |
| PRESENTENCE report received and filed [UNDER SEAL]. [19-1156] (AL) [Entered: 02/12/2019 04:13 PM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #121) filed by Appellant Sean Trim. Docketing Statement due 02/26/2019. Transcript Report/Order form due 02/26/2019. Appearance form due 02/26/2019. Fee due 02/26/2019. [19-1156] (AL) [Entered: 02/12/2019 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
