Concepcion v. Hazlewood
| ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, FCI Berlin, Warden |
| ALBERTO CONCEPCION |
| 19-1162 |
| February 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| LETTER regarding non-participation by U.S. Government filed by Attorney Seth R. Aframe for Appellee Robert Hazlewood. Certificate of service dated 04/09/2019. [19-1162] (SRA) [Entered: 04/09/2019 11:22 AM] |
| APPENDIX filed by Appellant Alberto Concepcion. Number of volumes: 1. Number of copies: 1. [19-1162] (AMM) [Entered: 04/03/2019 08:55 AM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Alberto Concepcion. Number of copies: 1. Certificate of service dated 03/27/2019. Brief due 04/26/2019 for APPELLEE Robert Hazlewood. [19-1162] (GB) [Entered: 04/02/2019 12:13 PM] |
| PLEADING tendered: APPENDIX filed by Appellant Alberto Concepcion. Number of Volumes: 1. Number of Copies: 1. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1162]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (AMM) [Entered: 04/01/2019 04:35 PM] |
| MOTION to compel the appellees and Motion to be released on bail (contained within appellant's brief) filed by Appellant Alberto Concepcion. Certificate of service dated 03/27/2019. [19-1162] (GB) [Entered: 04/02/2019 12:44 PM] |
| LETTER sent to Appellant Alberto Concepcion, acknowledging receipt on February 27, 2019 of a transcript report/order form. [19-1162] (GB) [Entered: 03/18/2019 09:18 AM] |
ORDER denying as moot motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Alberto Concepcion. [19-1162] (GK) [Entered: 02/28/2019 10:15 AM]
|
| PLEADING tendered: Transcript Report/Order Form filed by Appellant Alberto Concepcion. Certificate of service dated 02/20/2019. [19-1162] (GB) [Entered: 02/27/2019 02:19 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Alberto Concepcion. Certificate of service dated 02/20/2019. [19-1162] (GB) [Entered: 02/27/2019 02:23 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 04/01/2019 for appellant Alberto Concepcion. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [19-1162] (GB) [Entered: 02/19/2019 12:04 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Robert Hazlewood filed by Attorney Seth R. Aframe. Certificate of service dated 02/14/2019. [19-1162] (SRA) [Entered: 02/14/2019 12:37 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #14) filed by Appellant Alberto Concepcion. [19-1162] (GB) [Entered: 02/13/2019 11:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Concepcion v. Hazlewood | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, FCI Berlin, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Seth R. Aframe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ALBERTO CONCEPCION | |
| Represented By: | Alberto Concepcion |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
