Acosta v. William Trahant Jr. Constr.
| R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor |
| WILLIAM TRAHANT JR. CONSTRUCTION, INC. |
| 19-1223 |
| February 28, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| AGENCY CASE docketed. Application for summary enforcement filed by Petitioner R. Alexander Acosta. Appearance form due 03/15/2019. Administrative record due 04/10/2019. Copy of petition served on respondent pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [19-1223] (MH) [Entered: 03/01/2019 10:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Acosta v. William Trahant Jr. Constr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor | |
| Represented By: | Ronald Joseph Gottlieb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WILLIAM TRAHANT JR. CONSTRUCTION, INC. | |
| Represented By: | William R. Trahant Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
