Nagy v. Naday
| AGNES JAVORSZKY and EVA MARIA DAROCZY |
| EVA DAROCZY |
| JUDIT NADAY |
| TAMAS NAGY and TAMAS KALMAR NAGY |
| 19-1236 |
| March 7, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge; Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge and William J. Kayatta, Jr., Appellate Judge: On June 23, 2017, judgment entered in the district court. Appellant's notice of appeal was due thirty days thereafter. She failed to file a timely notice of appeal, and no motion to extend the time deadline was filed. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A). The appeal is untimely and therefore must be dismissed. See Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 213 (2007). [19-1236] (MH) [Entered: 04/17/2019 04:44 PM] |
| CASE submitted. Panel: Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge; Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge; William J. Kayatta, Jr., Appellate Judge. [19-1236] (KC) [Entered: 04/30/2019 01:50 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellee Tamas Kalmar Nagy. Copy of Order entered March 18, 2019. Forwarded to 75 N Main St #1010 Randolph, MA 02368. [19-1236] (ZN) [Entered: 04/09/2019 04:20 PM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellant Judit Naday to order [ # 6240258-2 ]. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1236] (MH) [Entered: 04/09/2019 02:15 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellee Tamas Kalmar Nagy. Copy of Case Opening Notice issued March 7, 2019. Forwarded to 75 N Main St #1010 Randolph, MA 02368. [19-1236] (ZN) [Entered: 04/01/2019 01:57 PM] |
| NOTICE of change of address filed by Party Tamas Kalmar Nagy. [19-1236] (MH) [Entered: 04/01/2019 01:17 PM] |
ORDER entered: Defendant-appellant Judit Naday filed a notice of appeal on February 28, 2019 from the judgment entered on June 23, 2017 in Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-14132-GAO (D. Mass.). Upon review of the record in this case, it appears that this appeal should be dismissed as untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (notice of appeal in civil case must be filed within thirty days of judgment or order appealed from). Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that appellant either move for voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) or show cause, in writing, why this appeal should not be dismissed. The failure to take either action by April 8, 2019 will lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). [19-1236] (MH) [Entered: 03/18/2019 03:57 PM]
|
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #25) filed by Appellant Judit Naday. Fee due 03/21/2019. [19-1236] (MH) [Entered: 03/07/2019 10:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
