Awosefaju v. Evans, et al
| LORRAINE C. EVANS, FANNY HERNANDEZ, Former President of MRCA, HENRY IDADA, Former President of MRCA, JEROME BRANCH, MANDELA HOLMES INC and MANDELA HOLMES, INC. |
| FRANCIS O. AWOSEFAJU |
| 19-1332 |
| April 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER entered by Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge: Appellant Francis Awosefaju's request for, among other things, appointment of counsel and consolidation of Appeal Nos. 18-2242 and 19-1332 is denied . There is no constitutional right to appointment of counsel in a civil case, and this is not an appropriate case for this court to exercise its discretion to seek counsel to represent appellant. See King v. Greenblatt , 149 F.3d 9, 14 (1st Cir. 1998); 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). [18-2242, 19-1332] (GRC) [Entered: 05/14/2019 11:43 AM]
|
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 06/17/2019 for appellant Francis O. Awosefaju. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [19-1332] (GRC) [Entered: 05/07/2019 01:53 PM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel and to consolidate cases filed by Appellant Francis O. Awosefaju in 17-1905, 18-2242, and 19-1332. Certificate of service was not included. [17-1905, 18-2242, 19-1332] (GRC) [Entered: 04/24/2019 11:20 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #11) filed by Appellant Francis O. Awosefaju. [19-1332] (GRC) [Entered: 04/11/2019 01:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
