Studley v. Jacobowitz, et al
| DAVID STUDLEY |
| IRWIN JACOBOWITZ and PEARL H. JACOBOWITZ |
| 19-1579 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for voluntary dismissal with show cause statement filed by Appellants Irwin Jacobowitz and Pearl H. Jacobowitz. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1579] (GB) [Entered: 08/06/2019 04:01 PM] |
| JUDGMENT entered: Defaulted. [19-1579] (GB) [Entered: 07/26/2019 09:14 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 07/11/2019, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless he registers for an appellate ECF account: Steven J. Hart for David Studley. [19-1579] (GB) [Entered: 06/27/2019 10:03 AM] |
SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: 5 (Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis) and Text Order entered on May 29, 2019 by Judge McConnell, Jr. denying [7] Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and certifying this appeal is not taken in good faith and any issues to be raised are frivolous. [19-1579] (GK) [Entered: 06/14/2019 09:01 AM]
|
|
ORDER entered: Upon review of the record in this case, it does not appear that this court has jurisdiction to consider defendants-appellants Irwin Jacobowitz and Pearl H. Jacobowitz's appeal from the Remand Order entered on May 14, 2019 or from the Order denying reconsideration entered on May 29, 2019 in No. 1:19-cv-00276-JJM-PAS (D.R.I.). Further, in a text order entered on June 12, 2019, the district court certified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A) that the appeal is not taken in good faith. If appellants seek to challenge the district courts certification, defendants-appellants must file a motion pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5) provided that appellants do so before July 15, 2019 . Accordingly, by July 15, 2019 , defendants-appellants are ordered either to move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b), or to show cause, in writing, why this appeal should not be dismissed and must either pay the $505 filing fee to the district court or file a motion in this court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). Failure to comply with this order will lead to dismissal of this appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. [19-1579] (GB) [Entered: 06/13/2019 12:52 PM]
|
| A review of the district court docket indicates that a request to proceed in forma pauperis is pending for Appellants Irwin Jacobowitz and Pearl H. Jacobowitz. [19-1579] (MH) [Entered: 06/12/2019 03:08 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #6) filed by Appellants Irwin Jacobowitz and Pearl H. Jacobowitz. [19-1579] (MH) [Entered: 06/12/2019 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
