US v. Ramirez
| UNITED STATES |
| CARLOS MANUEL RAMIREZ, a/k/a Chiripa, a/k/a Javao |
| 19-1692 |
| July 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #444) filed by Appellant Carlos Manuel Ramirez. Docketing Statement, Transcript Report/Order form, and Appearance form due 07/29/2019. [19-1692] (ALW) [Entered: 07/15/2019 02:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Ramirez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | Ginette Louise Milanes |
| Represented By: | Mariana E. Bauza Almonte |
| Represented By: | Marc Selim Chattah |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: CARLOS MANUEL RAMIREZ, a/k/a Chiripa, a/k/a Javao | |
| Represented By: | Raymond Luis Sanchez-Maceira |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
