Tatro v. Equifax Information Services, et al
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, a Georgia Lmited Liability Company, FRONTLINE ASSET STRATEGIES, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, ESC/CREDIT BASICS, an unknown business entity, CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC., a Washington Corporation, MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC., a Delaware Corporation and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., a Kansas Corporation |
| MICHAEL P. TATRO |
| 19-1760 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE issued. After 09/13/2019, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Matthew B. DiMario for Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. and Cullen W. Guilmartin for Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC. [19-1760] (CP) [Entered: 08/30/2019 04:09 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Encore Capital Group, Inc., Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Midland Funding, LLC filed by Attorney Kara Thorvaldsen. Certificate of service dated 08/01/2019. [19-1760] (KGT) [Entered: 08/01/2019 01:20 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. filed by Attorney William D. Pandolph. Certificate of service dated 08/01/2019. [19-1760] (WDP) [Entered: 08/01/2019 11:46 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #54) filed by Appellant Michael P. Tatro. Fee due 08/14/2019. [19-1760] (CP) [Entered: 07/31/2019 05:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
