Beaulieu-Bedford v. RI Department of Corrections, et al
| NORMAND BEAULIEU-BEDFORD |
| DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND and RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND |
| 19-1827 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Normand Beaulieu-Bedford. Certificate of service dated 10/19/2019. [19-1827] (GRC) [Entered: 10/24/2019 04:30 PM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file CAP memorandum filed by Appellant Normand Beaulieu-Bedford. Memorandum supporting issuance of CAP due 11/14/2019. [19-1827] (GK) [Entered: 10/23/2019 01:32 PM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file a memorandum supporting issuance of a certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Normand Beaulieu-Bedford. Certificate of service dated 10/11/2019. [19-1827] (GRC) [Entered: 10/21/2019 04:25 PM] |
|
ORDER directing petitioner to file a request for a certificate of appealabilty in this court by 10/15/2019. Date of denial by district court: July 29, 2019. [19-1827] (GRC) [Entered: 09/12/2019 10:39 AM]
|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Department of the Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island and Rhode Island Department of Corrections filed by Attorney Christopher R. Bush. Certificate of service dated 08/30/2019. [19-1827] (CRB) [Entered: 08/30/2019 09:09 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #51) filed by Appellant Normand Beaulieu-Bedford. [19-1827] (GRC) [Entered: 08/29/2019 05:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
