Morris v. Lam, et al
| CLEMENT G. MORRIS |
| DESMOND LAM and SUZANNE LEE, Principal |
| 19-1840 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE issued. [19-1840] (ALW) [Entered: 10/31/2019 02:03 PM] |
| STATEMENT REGARDING MEDICATIONS filed by Appellant Clement G. Morris in 19-1726. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1726, 19-1832, 19-1839, 19-1840]. (ALW) [Entered: 10/18/2019 12:16 PM] |
| JUDGMENT dismissing case in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). 19-1840 Defaulted [19-1840] (ALW) [Entered: 10/10/2019 01:19 PM] |
| NOTICE Regarding Rep-Payee Application (Form SSA-11-BK) filed by Appellant Clement G. Morris in 19-1726. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1726, 19-1832, 19-1839, 19-1840] (ALW) [Entered: 09/24/2019 03:03 PM] |
ORDER to Show Cause entered directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as duplicative. Show cause response due 10/02/2019. [19-1840] (ALW) [Entered: 09/18/2019 10:10 AM]
|
| PLEADING tendered: Photos filed by Appellant Clement G. Morris in 19-1726, 19-1832, 19-1839, 19-1840. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1726, 19-1832, 19-1839, 19-1840] (ALW) [Entered: 09/13/2019 02:27 PM] |
| PLEADING tendered: Copies of Documents filed by Appellant Clement G. Morris in 19-1832, 19-1839, 19-1840. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1832, 19-1839, 19-1840] (ALW) [Entered: 09/13/2019 02:24 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #15) filed by Appellant Clement G. Morris. Fee due 09/20/2019.. [19-1840] (ALW) [Entered: 09/06/2019 01:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
