Waithaka v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al
| AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. and AMAZON.COM, INC. |
| BERNARD WAITHAKA |
| 19-1848 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE issued. After 11/08/2019, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless shey registers for an appellate ECF account: Mary Grace Patterson for Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.. [19-1848] (GRC) [Entered: 10/25/2019 03:34 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Richard G. Rosenblatt for Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Douglas T. Schwarz for Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.. [19-1848] (GRC) [Entered: 10/25/2019 03:30 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 11/13/2019 for appellant Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [19-1848] (GRC) [Entered: 10/04/2019 03:35 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 10/10/2019, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Mary C. Patterson for Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc., Richard G. Rosenblatt for Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Douglas T. Schwarz for Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.. [19-1848] (GRC) [Entered: 09/26/2019 05:09 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. filed by Attorney David B. Salmons. Certificate of service dated 09/14/2019. [19-1848] (DBS) [Entered: 09/14/2019 10:14 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.. Certificate of service dated 09/09/2019. [19-1848] (NJK) [Entered: 09/09/2019 04:57 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Bernard Waithaka filed by Attorney Adelaide Pagano. Certificate of service dated 09/03/2019. [19-1848] (AHP) [Entered: 09/03/2019 03:20 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellants Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service dated 09/03/2019. [19-1848] (NJK) [Entered: 09/03/2019 08:34 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. filed by Attorney Noah J. Kaufman. Certificate of service dated 09/03/2019. [19-1848] (NJK) [Entered: 09/03/2019 08:32 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. filed by Attorney Michael E. Kenneally. Certificate of service dated 09/03/2019. [19-1848] (MEK) [Entered: 09/03/2019 09:22 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. filed by Attorney James P. Walsh, Jr.. Certificate of service dated 09/03/2019. [19-1848] (JPW) [Entered: 09/03/2019 10:33 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Bernard Waithaka filed by Attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan. Certificate of service dated 09/03/2019. [19-1848] (SEL) [Entered: 09/03/2019 03:18 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #61) filed by Appellants Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.. Docketing Statement due 09/17/2019. [19-1848] (GRC) [Entered: 09/03/2019 08:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
