Abernathy v. Anderson
| THOMAS A. GROBLEWSKI, BRUCE GELB, MICHAEL RUMERY, DARLING, a/k/a John Doe, GYLES, a/k/a John Doe, OFFICER BRIEU, a/k/a John Doe, SHELDON, a/k/a John Doe, LUIS S. SPENCER, SHAWN DEWEY, DAVID DARLING, a/k/a John Doe, GERARD BREAU, a/k/a John Doe, SHAWNN GYLES, a/k/a John Doe, SHAUN DEWEY and KYLE SHELDON, a/k/a John Doe |
| KRYSTAL ANDERSON |
| FRANKLIN B. ABERNATHY |
| 19-1880 |
| September 6, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Franklin B. Abernathy filed by Attorney Diana E. Coleman. Certificate of service dated 10/28/2019. [19-1880] (DC) [Entered: 10/28/2019 09:13 AM] |
| MOTION for Attorney Margaret L. Sullivan to withdraw as counsel filed by Appellant Franklin B. Abernathy. Certificate of service dated 10/21/2019. [19-1880] (MLS) [Entered: 10/21/2019 01:05 PM] |
ORDER entered: Attorney Margaret L. Sullivan has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant Franklin B. Abernathy. Upon consideration, the motion is allowed, and attorney Sullvian is hereby withdrawn. Appellant Franklin B. Abernathy will continue to be represented by his remaining counsel of record. [19-1880] (GB) [Entered: 10/21/2019 03:06 PM]
|
| NOTICE issued. The following attorney has failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Caroline M. Kelly for Krystal Anderson and Thomas A. Groblewski and Caroline M. Kelly for Thomas A. Groblewski. [19-1880] (GB) [Entered: 10/08/2019 08:47 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Krystal Anderson filed by Attorney Tory A. Weigand. Certificate of service dated 10/04/2019. [19-1880] (TAW) [Entered: 10/04/2019 02:48 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 11/13/2019 for appellant Franklin B. Abernathy. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [19-1880] (GB) [Entered: 10/04/2019 10:33 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 10/07/2019, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless she registers for an appellate ECF account: Caroline M. Kelly for Krystal Anderson and Thomas A. Groblewski. [19-1880] (GB) [Entered: 09/23/2019 08:34 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Krystal Anderson filed by Attorney James A. Bello, Esq.. Certificate of service dated 09/20/2019. [19-1880] (JAB) [Entered: 09/20/2019 11:06 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Franklin B. Abernathy filed by Attorney Margaret L. Sullivan. Certificate of service dated 09/19/2019. [19-1880] (MLS) [Entered: 09/19/2019 01:11 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Franklin B. Abernathy. Certificate of service dated 09/19/2019. [19-1880] (MLS) [Entered: 09/19/2019 01:12 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Franklin B. Abernathy filed by Attorney Ezekiel L. Hill. Certificate of service dated 09/19/2019. [19-1880] (ELH) [Entered: 09/19/2019 01:17 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Franklin B. Abernathy indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service dated 09/19/2019. [19-1880] (MLS) [Entered: 09/19/2019 01:13 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #258) filed by Appellant Franklin B. Abernathy. Appearance form, Docketing Statement and Transcript Report/Order form due 09/20/2019 . [19-1880] (GB) [Entered: 09/06/2019 12:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
