US v. Lacroix
| UNITED STATES |
| CAMERON LACROIX |
| 19-1952 |
| September 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #63) filed by Appellant Cameron Lacroix. Docketing Statement, Transcript Report/Order form, and Appearance form due 10/10/2019. [19-1952] (KC) [Entered: 09/26/2019 12:27 PM] |
| FORM for selection of counsel on appeal filed pro se by Appellant Cameron Lacroix requesting the appointment of new counsel. [19-1952] (KC) [Entered: 09/26/2019 01:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Lacroix | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | Cynthia A. Young |
| Represented By: | Mackenzie Queenin |
| Represented By: | Mona Sedky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: CAMERON LACROIX | |
| Represented By: | Charles P. McGinty |
| Represented By: | Cameron Lacroix |
| Represented By: | Behzad Mirhashem |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
