Merola v. Coco, et al
RICHARD COHEN |
CLAIRE COCO, AMY FALLONI, GOLDEN BROOK, INC., f/k/a Bond Industries, LTD, FRANK CIERI, OLDE CENTER VENTURES, INC., PETER M. COCO and DON GUIDO REALTY TRUST |
STEVEN MEROLA |
19-1972 |
October 4, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Frank Cieri, Claire Coco, Peter M. Coco, Don Guido Realty Trust, Amy Falloni, Golden Brook, Inc. and Olde Center Ventures, Inc. filed by Attorney Samer Obeid. Certificate of service dated 11/27/2019. [19-1972] (SO) [Entered: 11/27/2019 10:20 AM] |
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 12/04/2019 for appellant Steven Merola. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [19-1972] (AL) [Entered: 10/25/2019 04:40 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Steven Merola indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1972] (AL) [Entered: 10/22/2019 01:08 PM] |
COPY of district court order granting in forma pauperis status filed by Appellant Steven Merola. Certificate of service was not included. [19-1972] (AL) [Entered: 10/22/2019 01:06 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #75) filed by Appellant Steven Merola. Transcript Report/Order form due 10/18/2019. [19-1972]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (AL) [Entered: 10/04/2019 11:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.