Neufville v. State of Rhode Island
| NYANATI JERMAINE NEUFVILLE |
| STATE OF RHODE ISLAND |
| 19-2101 |
| October 30, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellant Nyanati Jermaine Neufville. Copy of Order entered November 1, 2019. Forwarding address unknown. [19-2101] (ZN) [Entered: 12/09/2019 04:51 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellant Nyanati Jermaine Neufville. Copy of Order entered November 12, 2019. Forwarding address unknown. [19-2101] (ZN) [Entered: 12/09/2019 04:42 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellant Nyanati Jermaine Neufville. Copy of Case Opening Notice issued October 30, 2019. Forwarding address unknown. [19-2101] (ZN) [Entered: 12/06/2019 03:31 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellant Nyanati Jermaine Neufville. Copy of Order entered November 4, 2019. Forwarding address unknown. [19-2101] (ZN) [Entered: 12/05/2019 12:50 PM] |
ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge; Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge and Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge: Petitioner's second motion to stay an order of removal pending review of the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition seeking to vacate a state court conviction is denied. [19-2101] (KPC) [Entered: 11/12/2019 04:49 PM]
|
| MOTION to stay removal filed by Appellant Nyanati Jermaine Neufville. Certificate of service dated 11/04/2019. [19-2101] (KPC) [Entered: 11/07/2019 08:58 AM] |
|
ORDER directing petitioner to file a request for a certificate of appealabilty in this court by 12/04/2019. Date of denial by district court: November 1, 2019. [19-2101] (KPC) [Entered: 11/04/2019 12:42 PM]
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: 8 (Motion for Certificate of Appealability) and 11 (Order entered on November 1, 2019 by Judge McConnell, Jr. denying [8] Motion for Certificate of Appealability). [19-2101] (GAK) [Entered: 11/04/2019 09:36 AM]
|
|
ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge; Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge and Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge: The motion to stay removal pending review of the dismissal of a petition seeking to vacate a state court conviction is denied. [19-2101] (KPC) [Entered: 11/01/2019 03:04 PM]
|
| MOTION to stay removal filed by Appellant Nyanati Jermaine Neufville. Certificate of service dated 10/30/2019. [19-2101] (AL) [Entered: 10/31/2019 02:59 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #9) filed by Appellant Nyanati Jermaine Neufville. [19-2101] (KC) [Entered: 10/30/2019 12:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Neufville v. State of Rhode Island | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: NYANATI JERMAINE NEUFVILLE | |
| Represented By: | Nyanati Jermaine Neufville |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: STATE OF RHODE ISLAND | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Robinson Bush |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
