Strahan v. Baynard, et al
| PAUL PARLON, DONALD BAYNARD, UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS and KATHERINE NEWMAN, in her official capacity as acting Chancellor of the University of Massachusetts in Boston |
| RICHARD MAX STRAHAN |
| 20-1052 |
| January 15, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of default issued. Appellant failed to file a transcript report/order form by the deadline. If transcripts are necessary for this appeal, appellant is directed to file a transcript order form by 03/11/2020. Absent a timely response, this court will set a briefing schedule, if appropriate. [20-1052] (RMK) [Entered: 02/26/2020 12:52 PM] |
ORDER to Show Cause entered directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Show cause response due 02/25/2020. [20-1052] (GRC) [Entered: 02/11/2020 04:57 PM]
|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Donald Baynard, Katherine Newman and University of Massachusetts filed by Attorney Mark A. Johnson. Certificate of service dated 01/22/2020. [20-1052] (MAJ) [Entered: 01/22/2020 09:44 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Donald Baynard, University of Massachusetts and Katherine Newman filed by Attorney Denise Barton. Certificate of service dated 01/22/2020. [20-1052] (DB) [Entered: 01/22/2020 09:29 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #84) filed by Appellant Richard Max Strahan. Transcript Report/Order form due 01/31/2020. [20-1052] (GRC) [Entered: 01/17/2020 04:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
