Riley v. US
| DANIEL JOHN RILEY |
| UNITED STATES |
| 20-1151 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PLEADING tendered: Pro se appearance form filed by Appellant Daniel John Riley in 20-1151, 20-1219. Certificate of service dated 02/28/2020. [20-1151, 20-1219] (ALW) [Entered: 03/10/2020 09:04 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Daniel John Riley. Docketing Statement, Transcript Report/Order form, and Appearance form due 03/05/2020. [20-1151] (MNH) [Entered: 02/20/2020 07:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Riley v. US | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DANIEL JOHN RILEY | |
| Represented By: | Richard F. Monteith Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | Seth R. Aframe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
